Chinese Birds     2010 1 (1):  65-69    ISSN: 1674-7674:  CN: 11-5870/Q

Improvement on molecular sex identification primers for Passeriform bird species
Ning WANG, Jianqiang LI, Yingying LIU, Zhengwang ZHANG *
MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences,
Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Received null  Revised null  Online 2010-02-12

Bensch S, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Hasselquist D. 1999. Do females adjust the sex of their offspring in relation to the breeding sex ratio? J Evol Biol, 12:1104–1109
Cockburn A, Double MC. 2008. Cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens show no facultative manipulation of offspring sex ratio despite plausible benefits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 62:681–688
Dreiss A, Richard M, Moyen F, White J, Moller AP, Danchin E. 2006. Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Behav Ecol, 17:13–19
Dubiec A, Zagalska-Neubauer M. 2006. Molecular techniques for sex identification in birds. Biol Lett, 43:3–12
Ellegren H. 1996. First gene on the avian W chromosome (CHD) provides a tag for universal sexing of non-ratite birds. Proc R Soc Lond B, 263:1635–1641
Ellegren H, Sheldon BC. 1997. New tools for sex identification and the study of sex allocation in birds. Trends Ecol Evol, 12:255–259
Ellegren H. 2002. Dosage compensation: do birds do it as well? Trends Genet, 18:25–28
Fiala KL. 1980. On estimating the primary sex ratio from incomplete data. Am Nat, 115:442–444
Frank SA. 1990. Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 21:13–55
Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H. 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol, 30:116–121
Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol, 7:1071–1075
Hatchwell BJ, Russell AF. 1996. Provisioning rules in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus: An experimental study. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 263:83– 88
Kahn NW, John JS, Quinn TW. 1998. Chromosome-specific intron size differences in the avian CHD gene provide an efficient method for sex identification in birds. Auk, 115: 1074–1078
Lessells K, Mateman C. 1996. Molecular sexing of birds. Nature, 383:761–762
McGowan A, Hatchwell BJ, Woodburn RJW. 2003. The effect of helping behaviour on the survival of juvenile and adult long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus. J Anim Ecol, 72:491– 499
McQueen HA, McBride D, Miele G, Bird AP, Clinton M. 2001. Dosage compensation in birds. Curr Biol, 11:253– 257
Nakagawa S. 2004. Is avian sex determination unique?: clues from a warbler and from chickens. Trends Genet, 20:479– 480
Quinn TW, Cooke F, White BN. 1990. Molecular sexing of geese using a cloned Z chromosomal sequence with homology to the W chromosome. Auk, 107:199–202
Saino N, de Ayala RM, Martinelli R, Boncoraglio G. 2008. Male-biased brood sex ratio depresses average phenotypic quality of barn swallow nestlings under experimentally harsh conditions. Oecologia, 156:441–453
Wang N, Zhang ZW. 2009. The novel primers for sex identification in the brown eared-pheasant and their application to other species. Mol Ecol Resour, 9:186–188
West SA, Sheldon BC. 2002. Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science, 295:1685–1688
Whittingham LA, Dunn PO. 2000. Offspring sex ratios in tree swallows: females in better condition produce more sons. Mol Ecol, 9:1123–1129
Woxvold IA, Magrath MJL. 2008. Sex-biases in the hatching sequence of cooperatively breeding apostlebirds Struthidea cinerea. Evol Ecol, 22:139–151

Corresponding author: Zhengwang ZHANG,MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China