Chinese Birds
Chinese Birds 2012, 3(4) 330-338 DOI:   10.5122/cbirds.2012.0037  ISSN: 1674-7674 CN: 11-5870/Q

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(219KB)
[HTML]
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to Bookshelf
Add to Citation Manager
Cite This Article
Email Alert
Keywords
antiparasite behavior
avian brood parasitism
Carduelis chloris
clutch size
meta-replication
nest desertion
Authors
Peter SAMA?
Lenka POLA?IKOVá
Mark E. HAUBER
Phillip CASSEY
Tomá? GRIM
PubMed
Article by Peter SAMA?
Article by Lenka POLA?IKOVá
Article by Mark E. HAUBER
Article by Phillip CASSEY
Article by Tomá? GRIM

Egg rejection behavior and clutch characteristics of the European Greenfinch introduced to New Zealand

Peter SAMAŠ 1,*, Lenka POLACIKOVÁ 1,2, Mark E. HAUBER 3, Phillip CASSEY 4, Tomáš GRIM 1

1 Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, CZ–771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic 2 Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1-3, CZ–612 42 Brno, Czech Republic 3 Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA 4 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

Abstract

Animal populations, with a known history of introduction events, provide opportunities to study the dynamics of how rapid shifts in ecological context affect behavioral (e.g., responses to brood parasitism) and life-history (e.g., clutch and egg parameters) traits. We studied the European Greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) introduced to New Zealand, regarding foreign-egg rejection behaviors and also compared their clutch characteristics with data from the source populations in the United Kingdom. Although previously this species had been considered an unsuitable host for the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), and not impacted by selection pressure associated with brood parasitism, we found that Greenfinches in our study population were able to eject experimental eggs at low frequencies. In contrast, nest desertion rates were similar in experimentally parasitized and control unmanipulated nests, implying that nest desertion is not an antiparasite adaptation in this species. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find significant differences in clutch and egg sizes between introduced and source populations. This study emphasizes (1) the importance of using control treatments in studies of host responses to experimental parasitism, (2) including apparently unsuitable hosts of brood parasites, and (3) meta-replicating prior studies to further the process of gaining and validating scientific knowledge.

Keywords antiparasite behavior   avian brood parasitism   Carduelis chloris   clutch size   meta-replication   nest desertion  
Received 2012-11-30 Revised 2012-12-10 Online:  
DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0037
Corresponding Authors: Peter Samas
Email: psamas@seznam.cz
About author:

References:
Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Kleven O, Honza M, Røskaft E. 2006. Eggshell strength of an obligate brood parasite: a test of the puncture resistance hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 60:11–18.
Boulton RL, Cassey P. 2006. An inexpensive method for identifying predators of passerine nests using tethered artificial eggs. New Zeal J Ecol, 30:377–385.
Briskie JV, Mackintosh M. 2004. Hatching failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101:558–561.
Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Evans KL. 2005. Changes in egg size of exotic passerines introduced to New Zealand. Notornis, 53:243–246.
Congdon NM, Briskie JV. 2010. Effect of population bottlenecks on the egg morphology of introduced birds in New Zealand. Ibis, 152: 136–144.
Cramp S, Simmons KEL, Perrins CM. 1994. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 8: Crows to Finches. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Davies NB, Brooke ML. 1989. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol, 58:225–236.
Davies NB. 2011. Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool, 284:1–14.
Evans KL, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Crick HQP. 2005. Investigating geographic variation in clutch size using a natural experiment. Funct Ecol, 19:616–624.
Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. 2011. Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol, 80:508–518.
Grim T. 2005. Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc, 84:69–78.
Grim T. 2006. Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 60:716–723.
Grim T. 2007. Equal rights for chick brood parasites. Ann Zool Fennici, 44:1–7.
Guigueno MF, Sealy SG. 2009. Nest sanitation plays a role in egg burial by yellow warblers. Ethology, 115:247–256.
Hale K, Briskie JV. 2007. Response of introduced European birds in New Zealand to experimental brood parasitism. J Avian Biol, 38:198–204.
Hauber ME, Moskát C, Bán M. 2006. Experimental shift in hosts’ acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett, 2:177–180.
Hauber ME. 2003. Interspecific brood parasitism and the evolution of host clutch sizes. Evol Ecol Res, 5:559–570.
Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, ?apek M, Mrlík V. 2004. Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol, 22:175–180.
Johnson DH. 2002. The importance of replication in wildlife research. J Wildl Manage, 66:919–932.
Kelly CD. 2006. Replicating empirical research in behavioral ecology: how and why it should be done but rarely ever is. Q Rev Biol, 81:221–236.
Kilner RM, Langmore NE. 2011. Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biol Rev, 86:836–852.
Kosciuch KL, Parker TH, Sandercock BK. 2006. Nest desertion by a cowbird host: an antiparasite behavior or a response to egg loss? Behav Ecol, 17:917–924.
Lahti DC. 2005. Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102:18057–18062.
Latif QS, Grenier JL, Heath SH, Ballard G, Hauber ME. 2006. First evidence of conspecific brood parasitism and egg ejection in song sparrows, with comments on methods sufficient to document these behaviors. Condor, 108:452–458.
López-de-Hierro MDG, Moreno-Rueda G. 2010. Egg-spot pattern rather than egg colour affects conspecific egg rejection in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 64:317–324.
Lyon BE, Eadie JMA. 2008. Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 39: 343–363.
MacMillan BWH. 1985. Breeding of Greenfinches in Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. Notornis, 32:85–93.
Martin TE. 1996. Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds: what do we really know? J Avian Biol, 27:263–272.
Martín-Gálvez D, Soler M, Soler JJ, Martín-Vivaldi M, Palomino JJ. 2005. Food acquisition by common cuckoo chicks in rufous bush robin nests and the advantage of eviction behaviour. Anim Behav, 70:1313–1321.
Martín-Vivaldi M, Soler M, Møller AP. 2002. Unrealistically high costs of rejecting artificial model eggs in cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. J Avian Biol, 33:295–301.
Merilä J, Björklund M, Baker AJ. 1996. The successful founder: genetics of introduced Carduelis chloris (greenfinch) populations in New Zealand. Heredity, 77:410–422.
Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC. 1991. Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour, 116:64–89.
Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 1992. Responses of some rare cuckoo hosts to mimetic model cuckoo eggs and to foreign conspecific eggs. Ornis Scand, 23:17–23.
Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Solli MM. 1994. Documenting puncture ejection of parasitic eggs by chaffinches Fringilla coelebs and blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla. Fauna Norv Ser C, 17:115–118.
Moskát C, Karcza Z, Csörgö T. 2003a. Egg rejection in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): the effect of mimicry. Ornis Fenn, 80:86–91.
Moskát C, Székely T, Kisbenedek T, Karcza Z, Bártol I. 2003b. The importance of nest cleaning in egg rejection behaviour of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J Avian Biol, 34:16–19.
Niethammer G. 1970. Clutch sizes of introduced European Passeriformes in New Zealand. Notornis, 17:214–222.
Ortega CP, Cruz A. 1988. Mechanisms of egg acceptance by marsh-dwelling blackbirds. Condor, 90: 349–358.
Petrie M, Pinxteen R, Eens M. 2009. Moorhens have an internal representation of their own eggs. Naturwissenschaften, 96:405–407.
Procházka P, Honza M. 2004. Egg discrimination in the yellowhammer. Condor, 106:405–410.
Robinson RA. 2005. BirdFacts: profiles of birds occurring in Britain and Ireland (v1.24, June 2009). BTO Research Report 407, BTO, Thetford. http://www.bto.org/birdfacts. Accessed 1 December 2012.
Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Moskát C, Honza M. 2002. The spatial habitat structure hypothesis of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos. Behav Ecol, 13:163–168.
Rothstein SI. 2001. Relic behaviours, coevolution and the retention versus loss of host defences after episodes of avian brood parasitism. Anim Behav, 61:95–107.
Ruxton GD. 2006. The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behav Ecol, 17:688–690.
Samaš P, Grim T, Hauber ME, Cassey P, Weidinger, Evans KL. 2013. Ecological predictors of reduced avian reproductive investment in the southern hemisphere. Ecography, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07927.x.
Samaš P, Hauber ME, Cassey P, Grim T. 2011. Repeatability of foreign egg rejection: testing the assumptions of co-evolutionary theory. Ethology, 117:606–619.
SAS Institute Inc. 2009. JMP version 8.0.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Seel DC, Davis PRK. 1981. Cuckoos reared by unusual hosts in Britain. Bird Study, 28:242–243.
Servedio MR, Hauber ME. 2006. To eject or to abandon? Life history traits of hosts and parasites interact to influence the fitness payoffs of alternative anti-parasite strategies. J Evol Biol, 19:1585–1594.
Soler JJ, Martínez JG, Soler M, Møller AP. 2001. Life history of magpie populations sympatric or allopatric with the brood parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Ecology, 82:1621–1631.
Soler JJ, Martín-Gálvez D, Martínez JG, Soler M, Canestrari D, Abad-Gómez JM, Møller AP. 2011. Evolution of tolerance by magpies to brood parasitism by great spotted cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B, 278:2047–2052.
Stokke BG, Hafstad I, Rudolfsen G, Bargain B, Beier J, Campas DB, Dyrcz A, Honza M, Leisler B, Pap PL. Patapavicius R, Prochazka P, Schulze-Hagen K, Thomas R, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Røskaft E, Soler M. 2007. Host density predicts presence of cuckoo parasitism in reed warblers. Oikos, 116:913–922
Svensson EI, Råberg L. 2010. Resistance and tolerance in animal enemy–victim coevolution. Trends Ecol Evol, 25:267–274.
Thomson GM. 1922. The Naturalisation of Plants and Animals in New Zealand. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Weidinger K. 2010. Foraging behaviour of nest predators at open-cup nests of woodland passerines. J Ornithol, 151:729–735.
White DJ, Ho L, de los Santos G, Godoy I. 2007. An experimental test of preferences for nest contents in an obligate brood parasite, Molothrus ater. Behav Ecol, 18:922–928.
Yom-Tov Y. 2000. An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis, 143: 133–143.
Similar articles

Copyright by Chinese Birds